By National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Laboratory Assessments Board, Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board
The cost of the military examine Laboratory Technical review Board (ARLTAB) is to supply biannual checks of the clinical and technical caliber of the examine, improvement, and research courses on the military study Laboratory (ARL). the recommendation supplied during this document specializes in technical instead of programmatic issues. The Board is assisted by means of six nationwide learn Council (NRC) panels, every one of which makes a speciality of the section of the ARL application carried out via one in all ARL's six directorates. whilst asked to take action via ARL, the Board additionally examines paintings that cuts around the directorates. The Board has been acting exams of ARL because 1996. the present document summarizes its discovering for the 2009-2010 interval, in which ninety six volunteer specialists in fields of technology and engineering participated within the following actions: traveling ARL every year, receiving formal displays of technical paintings, studying amenities, accomplishing technical discussions with ARL employees, and reviewing ARL technical fabrics. The Board is still inspired by means of the general caliber of ARL's technical employees and their paintings and applauds ARL for its transparent, passionate hindrance for the tip person of its technology--the soldier within the field--and for ARL's tested mindfulness of the significance of transitioning know-how to help quick and longer-term military wishes. ARL employees additionally proceed to extend their involvement with the broader clinical and engineering neighborhood. usually, ARL is operating rather well inside of a suitable examine and improvement (R&D) area of interest and has been demonstrating major accomplishments.
Read or Download 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory PDF
Similar assessment books
To listen to politicians speak, one may imagine the complete function of college is to evaluate young children instead of train them. pleasure approximately studying does not appear to be on anyone's schedule. The villains are those that take advantage of trying out mania, make the assessments, trainer for trying out, put up the books on which the exams are dependent, and think that the implications topic.
How can colleges most sensible arrange themselves to effectively teach refugee young children? through targeting the schooling of refugee kids, this ebook takes an extraordinary examine a subject matter of accelerating value in present academic spheres. Highlighting the numerous problems dealing with refugee kids, the editors draw upon a wealth of foreign event and assets to give a extensive, informative and delicate textual content.
Due to the necessarily subjective nature of artwork, the difficulty of comparing the murals scholars will constantly be arguable. within the challenge of evaluate in artwork and layout, a exotic workforce of artwork educators and specialists learn this divisive subject around the academic spectrum, from hassle-free colleges to college campuses.
Panel on Nanoscale technology and know-how, Laboratory exams Board, department on Engineering and actual Sciences, nationwide learn Council
The nationwide Institute of criteria and Technology's (NIST's) middle for Nanoscale technology and expertise (CNST) used to be based on might 1, 2007, and is still in improvement with admire to initiatives and staffing. It aspires to be well-known either as a global chief in every one of its study components and as a company offering prepared entry to unexcelled nanoscale dimension and fabrication amenities. An overview of the nationwide Institute of criteria and expertise heart for Nanoscale technological know-how and know-how evaluates the final CNST accomplishments and operations for FY 2009. As asked through the Deputy Director of NIST, the scope of the overview integrated the next standards: (1) the technical advantage of the present laboratory courses relative to present state of the art courses around the world; (2) the adequacy of the laboratory funds, amenities, apparatus, and human assets, as they have an effect on the standard of the laboratory's technical courses; and (3) the measure to which the laboratory courses in dimension technological know-how and criteria in attaining their acknowledged ambitions and wanted effect.
- Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of Achievement
- American Indian Educators in Reservation Schools
- Intelligence, Destiny and Education: The Ideological Roots of Intelligence Testing
- Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice (Evaluation in Education and Human Services)
- Transforming Learning (Institute of Education)
- Introduction to Kinesiology With Web Study Guide-4th Edition: Studying Physical Activity
Additional resources for 2009-2010 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory
Data mining has emerged in the commercial world as key for applications ranging from determining personalized online purchase preferences to performing portfolio analyses. In this 2009-2010 review cycle, CISD described several projects to begin such efforts, including work on Hadoop—the technique that has grown out of the Web search and services world to use large numbers of computers in an organized fashion to perform very fast unstructured searches on queries that are generated on the fly. This work is a valuable learning experience, but it is not research yet.
Also, one would expect that topologies that represent richer than a minimum connectivity would be more valuable in a warfighting environment where intermediate relays may be destroyed or go off-line. A related project involves indoor navigation in a Global Positioning System-denied environment using a combination of out-of-building sensors and dead reckoning based on a simple inertial navigation unit tied to a soldier’s foot. The project’s first year of work was reported to have been focused on the capabilities of a simple inertial measurement unit (IMU).
At the time of that assessment, ARL indicated that this development was in part an outgrowth of prior ARLTAB assessment findings which stated that a variety of issues associated with mobile networks had risen to be of crosscutting importance to ARL. The issues that ARLTAB had discussed as being important to the Army included network security, ad hoc wireless networks in particular, system prototyping, and model validation and verification. The structure of the then-new NSD focused on three levels of the problem: tactical network assurance, networking sciences development, and sustaining base network assurance.